Instead of objects popping out, the feature creates more depth to the image and makes objects visually stand out more. The other cool feature that we tried is turning regular television programs into simulated 3D. We watched Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1, and I have to say that the part when the snake popped out was awesome. As I said above, I can’t tell the difference between regular 4K and my HD LED TV, but my fiancé loves her 3D movies. I’ve been using my new TV for the past few weeks, and it’s cool. I chose the Sony over the LG mainly due to the price difference (the Sony was 50% off because a new version just debuted).
BEST 3D GLASSES FOR SAMSUNG 4K 1080P
A 4K TV’s resolution is 4,096x2,160 pixels, which means that passive glasses allow viewers to see 1080p resolution! Ta-da! At Best Buy, I looked at a few 4K options, LG (passive), Samsung (active), and Sony (passive). Passive 3D definitely seems like the better option of a bad situation, right? But then, 4K TVs are introduced, and I found an article called “4K TVs with passive 3D: Finally, a good use for all those pixels” by CNET’s David Katzmaier. This means that viewers paid to watch a 1080p TV, but only half of that resolution is seen when using the 3D feature! To add to that gripe, users can see lines on the TV. In terms of using passive glasses on a non-4K TV, the human eye can only see 1,920x540 pixels because the polarize lenses hide half the lines. There used to be many issues when trying to watch movies and TV shows in 3D before the introduction of 4K TVs as Morrison notes, and I will try to summarize a few of these issues. Passive glasses use polarized glasses, and the TV has a filter that polarizes each line of the pixels. passive 3D: What’s better?” that active glasses shutter open and close very quickly. Morrison writes in his article, “Active 3D vs.
BEST 3D GLASSES FOR SAMSUNG 4K MOVIE
Passive glasses, which are the glasses that movie theaters use, are cheaper ($10-$20) than the expensive, ($20-$150) battery-powered, active glasses. Therefore, I had to decide between active and passive 3D TVs. I looked into glasses-free 3D TVs, and I didn’t like them at all because of the “sweet spot” issue, which means that I would have to sit in a specific spot to see the 3D. I knew that if I was going to get a new TV, I wanted to upgrade my TV from my current LED TV, but I also knew I didn’t want a curved TV because it’s mostly a gimmick and difficult to view from an angle. As a researcher, I did some investigating on CNET before buying a TV. I've seen two in theaters, and they disorient me and give me headaches…so, this was truly a birthday present for her. Sony 55' LED 2160p Smart 3D $K Ultra HD TV
0 kommentar(er)
